PET TAILS: Ear cropping — where do you stand in controversial decision?

Cropping the ears of dogs is a controversial subject in the United States.

Two well-established US professional veterinary organizations, Animal Veterinary Medicine Association (AVMA) and the American Animal Hospital Association (AAHA) both oppose the practice of cosmetic ear cropping.

The American Kennel Club (AKC) supports ear cropping.

Ear cropping is the act of cutting off a part of a dog’s ear to modify its shape so that a naturally floppy ear stands up. The procedure is typically done when a puppy is between 6-12 weeks of age.

More than 20 dog breeds routinely have ear crops including: Boxers, Great Danes, Doberman Pinschers, Bully breeds, Cane Corso, Schnauzer and others.

Historically the reasons for cropping dogs’ ears were to reduce ear infections, reduce injury to ears, and improve hearing.

There is no scientific evidence that indicates ear cropping helps any of these issues.

Another reason given for ear cropping is that for guard-type dogs it makes them appear more alert and gives a distinctive appearance to certain breeds.

As with any surgical procedure, certain risks are associated with cropping a dog’s ears.

The dog must be under full anesthesia, which always has an associated risk. The incision, like any other, has a potential to become infected. In addition, as with any amputation, the procedure is painful.

Some dogs will need to have their ears taped to stand up and that may be done weekly for several weeks, involving ripping tape off the recently sutured ears. In the end, even after this painful procedure, their ears may not stand up or may have a distorted shape potentially leading to additional surgeries.

Many other countries have outlawed the practice of ear cropping, including most European and Scandinavian countries, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and more.

In 2007, the United Kingdom Kennel club banned dogs with cropped ears from participating in their shows.

The position statements for the three prominent US organizations are:

The AKC recognizes that ear cropping, tail docking, and dewclaw removal, as described in certain breed standards, are acceptable practices integral to defining and preserving breed character and/or enhancing good health. Appropriate veterinary care should be provided.

The AAHA is opposed to ear cropping or tail docking for cosmetic purposes as well as for breed standard purposes. More than 20 breed standards currently call for tail docking or ear cropping, but they recommend the removal of these breed standards and encourage member veterinarians to discontinue such elective procedures in their hospitals.

The AVMA opposes ear cropping and tail docking of dogs when done solely for cosmetic purposes.

Like the AAHA, he AVMA encourages the elimination of ear cropping and tail docking from breed standards.

What side of the controversy do you fall on? Should a puppy’s ears be cut off for appearance’s sake?

Submitted by Megan Gushwa, Brown County Humane Society Community Relations Manager